Now I’ve gone and done it…

Lately I’ve been trying to make a little side income writing at Infobarrel – it’s one of those revenue-sharing sites where you help provide decent content to earn search engine love for the site overall, and they let you share some ad space on their pages to earn a little cash.  I’m not very good at it so far because I’m constitutionally incapable of cranking out volumes of keyword-targeted product-centric fluff pieces, but overall I’ve found the community there to be friendly and helpful – a bunch of nice people trying to eek out a little extra from the InterTubes.

Yesterday I posted my first article there about atheism.  I don’t know if it will even get noticed, but I’m curious what the reaction there will be if it does.  A number of the IB regulars have openly expressed strong religious leanings, so it will be interesting to see what kind of reactions I get.  It’s nothing that should be too controversial – just a brief discussion of the misconception that atheists think the divine has been disproved, and an overview of the “Dawkins scale” of disbelief – but often it doesn’t take much to get people riled up.

 

Goodbye, Arthur, and Thanks

Human judges can show mercy. But against the laws of nature, there is no appeal.
— Arthur C. Clarke

Celebrity deaths are curious things; we find ourselves grieving over the loss of someone we’ve never met, and only knew through some body of work they’ve left behind as a legacy or, in some cases, have only even heard of because they were “famous for being famous”. Usually these deaths have little effect on me; I may regret the loss of further contributions from that person, or commiserate in a detached sort of way with their families because I know what it’s like to lose a loved one. But at most there’s only a momentary pang of sadness, and then I get on with living life among the people who I do know and care about on a personal level.

Before today, only three times had the passing of someone famous had a profound impact on me, a sense that somehow the sum total of the things that are wondrous and wonderful here on our little space rock has been diminished in a way from which it will never fully recover. The first two were Jim Henson and Carl Sagan, who had tremendous influences on my childhood and adolescence. The third was, for reasons I have yet to figure out, the actor Andreas Katsulas, about whom I knew almost absolutely nothing beyond that he played a favorite character of mine on a television show (I have only a vague sort of knowledge what the guy even looked like behind the mask and makeup that turned him into G’kar).

It’s fairly well known that when Hemingway wrote “ask not for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee“, he was saying that the loss of one life is a loss for us all, and we are lessened by it.

Today, the bell rang out loud and clear for science fiction writer Sir Arthur C. Clarke. Best known in popular culture for the movie “2001: A Space Odyssey” and its sequels, Clarke is better remembered for the many books, stories, and articles written in his 90 years of life. His imagination has changed our world; he was the guy who, in the 1940s, came up with the crazy idea of trying to put a man-made object into orbit and bounce communication signals off it. Of the men I consider the grand masters of science fiction – Heinlein, Asimov, Herbert, Clarke, and Bradbury, all gone now save for the last – Clarke was often perhaps the most realistically visionary. By this I mean that while he could write visions of the far future with the best of them, he also excelled at showing us hints of the near tomorrows, the almost-here futures that, for better or worse, could (and often did) happen during his readers’ lifetimes.

I’d like to end with a small selection of quotes from his writing, but there are so many great ones to choose from that it’s hard to limit myself to just a few.

There is, of course, Clarke’s Third Law:

Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.

Another favorite of mine is this one, a sentiment echoed later by Carl Sagan in his “Pale Blue Dot” monologue:

It is not easy to see how the more extreme forms of nationalism can long survive when men have seen the Earth in its true perspective as a single small globe against the stars.

On information vs. knowledge:

…it is vital to remember that information — in the sense of raw data — is not knowledge, that knowledge is not wisdom, and that wisdom is not foresight. But information is the first essential step to all of these.

He had a few thoughts on religion as well:

Perhaps our role on this planet is not to worship God — but to create Him.

I would defend the liberty of consenting adult creationists to practice whatever intellectual perversions they like in the privacy of their own homes; but it is also necessary to protect the young and innocent.

The greatest tragedy in mankind’s entire history may be the hijacking of morality by religion.

I don’t believe in God but I’m very interested in her.

When challenged to write a 10-word short story:

“God said, ‘Cancel Program GENESIS.’ The universe ceased to exist.”

On UFOs:

They tell us absolutely nothing about intelligence elsewhere in the universe, but they do prove how rare it is on Earth.

There are plenty more where those came from, but I’ll sign off with Clarke’s own words on the occasion of his 90th birthday last December:

I’m sometimes asked how I would like to be remembered. I’ve had a diverse career as a writer, underwater explorer, space promoter and science populariser. Of all these, I want to be remembered most as a writer – one who entertained readers, and, hopefully, stretched their imagination as well.

I find that another English writer — who, coincidentally, also spent most of his life in the East — has expressed it very well. So let me end with these words of Rudyard Kipling:

If I have given you delight
by aught that I have done.
Let me lie quiet in that night
which shall be yours anon;

And for the little, little span
the dead are borne in mind,
seek not to question other than,
the books I leave behind.

This is Arthur Clarke, saying Thank You and Goodbye from Colombo!

A Perfect Storm Is The New Back In The Day

Lake Superior State University has released a list of words and phrases to avoid using because they’ve been overused and lost their original significance. Among them are ones I’d expect to see – “Throw him under the bus”, “x is the new y”, “post 9/11”, “surge”, etc. “Webinar” is in there too, which is kind of surprising as I’ve only seen the word in print a couple of times and have never heard anyone actually say it.

Suspiciously absent from the list was the tiresome “at the end of the day”, a staple these days on TV and in print alike, especially among political pundits. At the end of the day, if you’re going to use “at the end of the day”, you’d better be talking about something that’s actually going to happen at the end of the day.

SYWTBUR: Back in the Submission Saddle

Well, after a long period of distraction and plain old procrastination, I lay staring at the ceiling in bed last night thinking, I really need to get back to work on those query submissions. At around 7 AM I finally gave up on sleep and came downstairs to start grinding through the agent list I compiled a while back.

I sent 10 more e-queries out, which took me till about 11:35. Why so long for 10 e-mails? Well, for one thing, at each step of the way I went back to the agent or agency’s web site to make sure there were no changes to their submission guidelines since I first looked into them late last year. I tinkered with my query letter a bit, plus I had to come up with a one-page story synopsis separate from the query letter itself because two of the agencies asked for this.

I’ll let these percolate for a couple of weeks before firing off the next set; then it will be time to start on the snail-mail side of the list, which I haven’t ventured into yet.

Meanwhile I’m about 70 pages into my next book. I’m not exactly sure where this new story is going to take me, but wherever it is, I’m having fun getting there.

Update on Publication

Going back over my previous entries I realized that I never did post the end result of sending a sample chapter by request to an agency that expressed interest in my book based on my query letter.

Basically, they sent back a fairly generic rejection letter:

Thank you so much for sending sample pages of SPIRIT’S END.

After a careful reading, we are sorry to say that we don’t believe that we are the right agency for you.

You deserve an enthusiastic representative, so we recommend that you pursue other agents. After all, it just takes one “yes” and with so many different opinions out there, you could easily find the right match.

Good luck with all your publishing endeavors.

Truthfully, I expect to see a lot more like this as I go through this process.

I’ve been rather lax in my submissions to agents lately… in the sense that I haven’t made any. I’ve been tweaking Spirit’s End a little more, working on the begninning of a new book, building my list of targeted agents and publishers, and doing the December holiday thing. I plan to resume submitting around the end of the month – hopefully that will allow enough time for industry folks to have cleared out their “slush piles” of works to review that have built up over the winter vacation season.

An Update on the Search for Publication

Sent off a partial manuscript two weeks ago based on the inquiry I mentioned. I’ve taken a break from sending out queries for the time being because after not working on the manuscript itself for half a month, I looked back at it and decided there were more changes I wanted to make. So I’m temporarily back in edit mode, with agent-hunting to resume soon. Assuming I don’t go back to make more changes, that is.

A Nibble!

One of the agencies I e-queried last week has asked me to mail them a partial manuscript. They’ve asked that along with it I send “a cover letter with a short but detailed bio highlighting your publishing credentials and/or related information about you and a one-paragraph blurb that summarizes your work and highlights your pitch.”

I’m at a bit of a loss as to whether this just means to use a slightly modified version of my query letter (with “I am seeking representation before” replaced by “Here is the material you requested”), or whether the agent will expect to see something new here. I’ll be spending some time searching Writers.net and other sites today in search of a clue.

Slow Week

Not much of note so far this week. No new replies from agents save for one who essentially said he was too swamped to take on new clients. Spent Wednesday at an all-day meeting in lovely downtown Trenton, NJ. Bleh. On Tuesday, Bush ran the constitution through a shredder, burnt the resulting slivers, then, with a sigh of pleasure, proceeded to relieve himself on the ashes. Arrest without charges and indefinite detention without trial is now the law of the land here in the good old Land of the Free.

So, yeah. Slow week.

Word to 2008 presidential candidates: I’m voting for whoever’s platform is based on taking the following actions on day 1 in office:

Step 1: Every Politburo member who voted for the repeal of Habeus Corpus is declared an enemy combatant and, under the very law they put into place, swept up and interred without trial at a prison camp in some desert hellhole. Likewise every pundit who went on the air screaming the need to relinquish our safety for our own safety.

Step 2: Repeal the act, but not retroactively. Need to put the fear of “freedomboarding” into those folks for a bit first.

It occurs to me that under the new law I’m quite possibly putting myself at risk of “disappearance” by writing this. Good thing nobody reads it.

Rejection at the Speed of Light

I sent out a few e-queries today, not expecting to hear anything back for a few weeks at least. To my surprise, I got a reply on one of them before I had even sent out the next:

Thank you for your recent letter. I regret to say that your work doesn’t appear to be the kind of material I am currently looking for.

However, opinions vary considerably in this business, and I wish you the best of luck in your search for representation.

Best wishes,

Basically a fairly standard cut-and-paste e-rejection. Doesn’t tell me much but that this particular agent, for reasons unspecified, isn’t interested in seeing my work beyond the query letter. No big deal, really; I expect to get lots like this.

Still, the surprise of insta-rejection spurred me to go back and take another look at my query letter and see where there might be room for improvement.

It was during this review that I realized I had spelled his name wrong.

Oops!